DYNACARE INC DNCR (last ticker on record)
CIK 1004938Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.18×
- Goodman and CarrFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 6 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.73× · Went dark 4.24× · 95% wipeout 4.09×
- Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 1,051 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.31× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Epstein Becker & GreenFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 115 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.44× · Went dark 1.35× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Kirkland & EllisFirst linked Nov 2001 · Text search only · 1,686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.17× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- McCarthy TetraultFirst linked Oct 2001 · Text search only · 111 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.76× · Went dark 0.57× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hogan & Hartson | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.18 |
| Goodman and Carr | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 6 | 2.73 | 4.24 | 4.09 |
| Weil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 1,051 | 1.31 | 0.27 | 0.91 |
| Epstein Becker & Green | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 115 | 1.44 | 1.35 | 1.14 |
| Kirkland & Ellis | Nov 2001 | Text search only | 1,686 | 0.98 | 0.17 | 0.87 |
| McCarthy Tetrault | Oct 2001 | Text search only | 111 | 0.76 | 0.57 | 1.41 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked Aug 2002 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.39×
- DAVID P. STONEWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLPFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.85× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.76×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | Aug 2002 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.39 |
| DAVID P. STONEWeil, Gotshal & Manges LLP | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 11 | 0.85 | 0.00 | 0.76 |