REGIONAL HEALTH PROPERTIES, INC RHEP (last ticker on record)

CIK 1004724Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)

Restatement
Restructuring
Delisting notice (not a red flag)

These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.

Red flags: 2; Newest began Jul 2018
Largest fall in its shares: —; None of 95% on record
Law firms: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies
Lawyers: 8; Linked to 5 or more companies

What happened

May 19, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Feb 7, 2025Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Nov 12, 2024Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 7, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 6, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jan 9, 2023Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 31, 2022Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 24, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 22, 2019Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Aug 31, 2018Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jul 24, 2018Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 6, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 22, 2016Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Jun 18, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
May 23, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Apr 23, 2013Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
Mar 13, 2013Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)

An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.

Law firms

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Law firms linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Troutman Pepper Locke LLP	May 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	90	0.00	0.00	0.14
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP	Feb 2023	Named in SEC correspondence	154	1.18	0.00	1.15
Smith, Gambrell & Russell, LLP	Feb 2022	Named in a filing	92	0.96	1.05	1.20
Baker Botts L.L.P.	Jun 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	495	1.32	0.09	1.03
Rogers & Hardin	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	38	0.62	0.00	1.19
Carlile Patchen & Murphy LLP	Feb 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	6	0.00	0.00	0.00
Reed Smith	Jul 2011	Text search only	487	1.15	0.77	1.13
Cozen O'Connor P.C.	Feb 2006	Text search only	163	1.03	0.63	0.94

Lawyers

The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.

Lawyers linked to this company
Name	First linked	How it is known	Linked companies	SEC/DOJ scrutiny	Went dark	95% wipeout
Paul Davis FancherTroutman Sanders LLP	May 2025	Named in SEC correspondence	11	0.78	1.45	0.59
Clinton W. RancherBaker Botts L.L.P.	Jun 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	20	0.78	0.00	1.18
Joshua DavidsonBaker Botts L.L.P.	Jun 2021	Named in SEC correspondence	42	1.01	0.00	0.87
James T. SeeryDuane Morris	Jul 2013	Named in a filing	76	0.87	0.00	1.14
Lori A. GelchionRogers & Hardin	Jun 2011	Named in SEC correspondence	12	0.86	0.00	0.74
Robert C. HussleRogers & Hardin	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	8	0.00	0.00	1.17
Steven E. FoxRogers & Hardin	Jun 2011	Named in a filing	7	0.99	0.00	1.22
Michael A. SmithCarlile Patchen & Murphy LLP	Feb 2006	Named in SEC correspondence	5	0.00	0.00	0.00