CYCH INC CYCH (last ticker on record)
CIK 1004232Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- 95% wipeout
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2000
- Largest fall in its shares
- 96%
- Apr 1998 to Feb 2001
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Shares down 95% from their high
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 143 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 1.33× · 95% wipeout 0.80×
- DLA PiperFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 1,185 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.45× · 95% wipeout 1.17×
- Hogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.30× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 143 | 1.05 | 1.33 | 0.80 |
| DLA Piper | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 1,185 | 1.00 | 0.45 | 1.17 |
| Hogan & Hartson | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 390 | 1.03 | 0.30 | 1.20 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P.First linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 10 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.73× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.01×
- Nancy A. SpanglerDLA PiperFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
- Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.00× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Diane Holt FrankleDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.37× · Went dark 1.59× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- JOSEPH B. HERSHENSONDLA PiperFirst linked Apr 1998 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 2.12×
- Michael J. SilverHogan & HartsonFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.72× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Edwin M. Martin Jr.Piper & Marbury L.L.P. | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 10 | 0.73 | 0.00 | 1.01 |
| Nancy A. SpanglerDLA Piper | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 1.92 |
| Amy Bowerman FreedHogan & Hartson | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.55 | 1.00 | 0.96 |
| Diane Holt FrankleDLA Piper | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 17 | 0.37 | 1.59 | 1.00 |
| JOSEPH B. HERSHENSONDLA Piper | Apr 1998 | Named in a filing | 5 | 1.13 | 0.00 | 2.12 |
| Michael J. SilverHogan & Hartson | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.72 | 0.00 | 1.28 |