Impax Laboratories, LLC IPXL (last ticker on record)
CIK 1003642Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Went dark (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 3
- Newest began Mar 2016
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC action against a company that stopped filingSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K/A (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Latham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 2,667 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
- Blank RomeFirst linked May 2000 · Named in SEC correspondence · 348 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.79× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- Fulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 359 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.10× · Went dark 0.75× · 95% wipeout 1.35×
- Chadbourne & ParkeFirst linked Nov 2008 · Text search only · 110 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Dilworth Paxson LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.96× · Went dark 1.58× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
- Schulte Roth & ZabelFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 296 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.44× · 95% wipeout 0.99×
- Sonnenschein Nath & RosenthalFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 160 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.08× · Went dark 0.56× · 95% wipeout 1.23×
- WolfBlock LLPFirst linked Oct 2008 · Text search only · 84 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.04×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Latham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 2,667 | 0.98 | 0.31 | 1.10 |
| Blank Rome | May 2000 | Named in SEC correspondence | 348 | 1.04 | 0.79 | 1.36 |
| Fulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 359 | 1.10 | 0.75 | 1.35 |
| Chadbourne & Parke | Nov 2008 | Text search only | 110 | 1.64 | 0.62 | 0.87 |
| Dilworth Paxson LLP | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 25 | 0.96 | 1.58 | 1.04 |
| Schulte Roth & Zabel | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 296 | 0.93 | 0.44 | 0.99 |
| Sonnenschein Nath & Rosenthal | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 160 | 1.08 | 0.56 | 1.23 |
| WolfBlock LLP | Oct 2008 | Text search only | 84 | 0.84 | 1.36 | 1.04 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 74 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.30× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 37 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.95× · Went dark 0.74× · 95% wipeout 0.78×
- Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Named in a filing · 53 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.55× · Went dark 1.08× · 95% wipeout 1.36×
- MICHAEL JOSEPHDyer Ellis & JosephFirst linked Oct 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.93× · Went dark 4.61× · 95% wipeout 1.83×
- Francis E. DehelBlank RomeFirst linked Jan 2003 · Named in a filing · 19 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.15× · Went dark 2.54× · 95% wipeout 0.42×
- Sheldon G. NussbaumFulbright & JaworskiFirst linked Sep 1997 · Named in a filing · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.70× · Went dark 4.71× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- RYAN K. DEFORDLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked May 2018 · Text search only · 15 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.38× · Went dark 4.40× · 95% wipeout 0.38×
- Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLPFirst linked Dec 2011 · Text search only · 58 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.63× · Went dark 0.80× · 95% wipeout 1.41×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles K. RuckLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 74 | 1.30 | 0.35 | 0.69 |
| R. Scott SheanLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 37 | 1.95 | 0.74 | 0.78 |
| Wesley C. HolmesLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Named in a filing | 53 | 1.55 | 1.08 | 1.36 |
| MICHAEL JOSEPHDyer Ellis & Joseph | Oct 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 1.93 | 4.61 | 1.83 |
| Francis E. DehelBlank Rome | Jan 2003 | Named in a filing | 19 | 2.15 | 2.54 | 0.42 |
| Sheldon G. NussbaumFulbright & Jaworski | Sep 1997 | Named in a filing | 11 | 2.70 | 4.71 | 0.00 |
| RYAN K. DEFORDLatham & Watkins LLP | May 2018 | Text search only | 15 | 2.38 | 4.40 | 0.38 |
| Tad J. FreeseLatham & Watkins LLP | Dec 2011 | Text search only | 58 | 0.63 | 0.80 | 1.41 |