First Physicians Capital Group, Inc. FPCG (last ticker on record)
CIK 1003226Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Mar 2015
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- SEC administrative actionSEC order (opens in a new tab)
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- McDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 562 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.97× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.14×
- Sheppard MullinFirst linked Dec 2000 · Named in a filing · 392 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.12× · Went dark 0.81× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Jones DayFirst linked Jun 2014 · Text search only · 686 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.25× · Went dark 0.54× · 95% wipeout 1.12×
- Baker & McKenzieFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 587 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 1.00×
- Conyers Dill & PearmanFirst linked Oct 2004 · Text search only · 531 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.89× · Went dark 0.35× · 95% wipeout 1.16×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| McDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 562 | 0.97 | 0.60 | 1.14 |
| Sheppard Mullin | Dec 2000 | Named in a filing | 392 | 1.12 | 0.81 | 1.22 |
| Jones Day | Jun 2014 | Text search only | 686 | 1.25 | 0.54 | 1.12 |
| Baker & McKenzie | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 587 | 1.07 | 0.72 | 1.00 |
| Conyers Dill & Pearman | Oct 2004 | Text search only | 531 | 0.89 | 0.35 | 1.16 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Charles T. HaagWinston & StrawnFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in SEC correspondence · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.67× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.62×
- James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 14 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.03× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.89×
- John J. GiovannoneMcDermott Will & EmeryFirst linked Nov 2001 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.88× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Charles T. HaagWinston & Strawn | Jun 2014 | Named in SEC correspondence | 18 | 1.67 | 0.00 | 1.62 |
| James E. O BannonAllen Matkins Leck Gamble Mallory & Natsis LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 14 | 1.03 | 0.00 | 1.89 |
| John J. GiovannoneMcDermott Will & Emery | Nov 2001 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.88 | 0.00 | 0.00 |