LCA VISION INC LCAV (last ticker on record)
CIK 1003130Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Oct 2009
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 4
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Olshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 390 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.86× · 95% wipeout 1.22×
- Taft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Mar 2005 · Named in SEC correspondence · 94 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.64× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
- Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 96 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.64× · Went dark 0.24× · 95% wipeout 0.64×
- Sullivan & CromwellFirst linked Sep 2003 · Text search only · 1,047 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.40× · Went dark 0.15× · 95% wipeout 0.69×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Olshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 390 | 1.38 | 0.86 | 1.22 |
| Taft Stettinius & Hollister | Mar 2005 | Named in SEC correspondence | 94 | 1.64 | 0.31 | 0.69 |
| Dinsmore & Shohl | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 96 | 0.64 | 0.24 | 0.64 |
| Sullivan & Cromwell | Sep 2003 | Text search only | 1,047 | 1.40 | 0.15 | 0.69 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Jan 2009 · Named in SEC correspondence · 52 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.61× · Went dark 0.72× · 95% wipeout 0.77×
- Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLPFirst linked Dec 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 95 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.71× · Went dark 0.37× · 95% wipeout 0.90×
- TIMOTHY E. HOBERGTaft Stettinius & HollisterFirst linked Apr 2006 · Named in SEC correspondence · 11 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.21× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Susan B. ZaunbrecherDinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jun 1999 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Charles F. Hertlein Jr.Dinsmore & ShohlFirst linked Jul 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 12 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.70× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.88×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andrew M. FreedmanOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Jan 2009 | Named in SEC correspondence | 52 | 1.61 | 0.72 | 0.77 |
| Steve WoloskyOlshan Frome Wolosky LLP | Dec 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 95 | 1.71 | 0.37 | 0.90 |
| TIMOTHY E. HOBERGTaft Stettinius & Hollister | Apr 2006 | Named in SEC correspondence | 11 | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Susan B. ZaunbrecherDinsmore & Shohl | Jun 1999 | Named in a filing | 8 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Charles F. Hertlein Jr.Dinsmore & Shohl | Jul 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 12 | 0.70 | 0.00 | 0.88 |