PYRAMID BREWERIES INC PMID (last ticker on record)
CIK 1001917Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Seward & KisselFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 164 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.78× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 1.28×
- Graham & Dunn PCFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in a filing · 30 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.32× · Went dark 1.36× · 95% wipeout 1.66×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
- Heller EhrmanFirst linked Mar 2001 · Named in a filing · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 0.76× · 95% wipeout 0.96×
- Foster PepperFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 43 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.81× · Went dark 0.62× · 95% wipeout 1.92×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seward & Kissel | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 164 | 0.78 | 0.19 | 1.28 |
| Graham & Dunn PC | Jul 2008 | Named in a filing | 30 | 0.32 | 1.36 | 1.66 |
| Perkins Coie | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
| Heller Ehrman | Mar 2001 | Named in a filing | 256 | 1.00 | 0.76 | 0.96 |
| Foster Pepper | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 43 | 0.81 | 0.62 | 1.92 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Robert E. LustrinSeward & KisselFirst linked Jul 2008 · Named in SEC correspondence · 40 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.29× · Went dark 0.55× · 95% wipeout 3.08×
- Eric A. DeJongPerkins CoieFirst linked Jul 2004 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- David R. WilsonHeller EhrmanFirst linked Nov 1996 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.00× · Went dark 1.29× · 95% wipeout 1.56×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Robert E. LustrinSeward & Kissel | Jul 2008 | Named in SEC correspondence | 40 | 1.29 | 0.55 | 3.08 |
| Eric A. DeJongPerkins Coie | Jul 2004 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| David R. WilsonHeller Ehrman | Nov 1996 | Named in a filing | 25 | 1.00 | 1.29 | 1.56 |