SMART MODULAR TECHNOLOGIES INC SMOD (last ticker on record)
CIK 1001840Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
NoneThese figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 0
- None on record
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 8
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
No red flag or SEC or Justice Department event on record.
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Davis PolkFirst linked Aug 2005 · Named in a filing · 1,694 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.26× · Went dark 0.06× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Aug 1997 · Named in a filing · 1,468 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.09× · Went dark 0.60× · 95% wipeout 1.42×
- Maples and CalderFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 1,144 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.95× · Went dark 0.26× · 95% wipeout 0.92×
- Mayer BrownFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 680 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.98× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 0.94×
- Morris Nichols Arsht & TunnellFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 256 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.51× · Went dark 0.21× · 95% wipeout 0.89×
- Pietrantoni Mendez & AlvarezFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 17 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.98× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.05×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- White & CaseFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 907 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.04× · Went dark 0.33× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Davis Polk | Aug 2005 | Named in a filing | 1,694 | 1.26 | 0.06 | 1.02 |
| Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Aug 1997 | Named in a filing | 1,468 | 1.09 | 0.60 | 1.42 |
| Maples and Calder | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 1,144 | 0.95 | 0.26 | 0.92 |
| Mayer Brown | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 680 | 0.98 | 0.34 | 0.94 |
| Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 256 | 1.51 | 0.21 | 0.89 |
| Pietrantoni Mendez & Alvarez | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 17 | 1.98 | 0.00 | 1.05 |
| Shearman & Sterling | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| White & Case | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 907 | 1.04 | 0.33 | 0.91 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & RosatiFirst linked Sep 2005 · Text search only · 63 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.34× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.72×
- David W. FergusonFirst linked Aug 2005 · Text search only · 18 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 1.03× · 95% wipeout 1.10×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steven E. BochnerWilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati | Sep 2005 | Text search only | 63 | 1.34 | 0.00 | 0.72 |
| David W. Ferguson | Aug 2005 | Text search only | 18 | 1.49 | 1.03 | 1.10 |