EMERITUS CORP ESC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1001604Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restatement
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began May 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 2
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 7
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions cooperating with the Justice DepartmentForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Said its accounts could not be relied on (Item 4.02)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLPFirst linked Jun 2014 · Named in a filing · 2,607 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.19× · 95% wipeout 0.85×
- Perkins CoieFirst linked Jul 1998 · Named in a filing · 511 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.27× · 95% wipeout 0.98×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP | Jun 2014 | Named in a filing | 2,607 | 1.15 | 0.19 | 0.85 |
| Perkins Coie | Jul 1998 | Named in a filing | 511 | 0.93 | 0.27 | 0.98 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- David F. McSheaPerkins CoieFirst linked Aug 2013 · Named in a filing · 16 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.14× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.20×
- Andrew BorPerkins CoieFirst linked May 2009 · Named in a filing · 32 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.97× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Eric A. DeJongPerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2006 · Named in a filing · 25 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.68× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.09×
- J. Sue MorganPerkins CoieFirst linked May 2001 · Named in a filing · 23 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.48×
- Gregory GorderPerkins CoieFirst linked Jan 1997 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.02× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- MICHAEL E. STANSBURYPerkins CoieFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.04× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.15×
- Paul SassalosPerkins CoieFirst linked Nov 2005 · Text search only · 7 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.27× · Went dark 3.26× · 95% wipeout 1.29×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| David F. McSheaPerkins Coie | Aug 2013 | Named in a filing | 16 | 1.14 | 0.00 | 1.20 |
| Andrew BorPerkins Coie | May 2009 | Named in a filing | 32 | 1.97 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Eric A. DeJongPerkins Coie | Nov 2006 | Named in a filing | 25 | 0.68 | 0.00 | 1.09 |
| J. Sue MorganPerkins Coie | May 2001 | Named in a filing | 23 | 1.16 | 0.00 | 0.48 |
| Gregory GorderPerkins Coie | Jan 1997 | Named in a filing | 5 | 2.02 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| MICHAEL E. STANSBURYPerkins Coie | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.04 | 0.00 | 1.15 |
| Paul SassalosPerkins Coie | Nov 2005 | Text search only | 7 | 2.27 | 3.26 | 1.29 |