TUCSON ELECTRIC POWER CO
CIK 100122Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- Restructuring
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 1
- Newest began Dec 2014
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 6
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Debt accelerated (Item 2.04)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Pillsbury WinthropFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 516 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.13× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.27×
- Morgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 1,028 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.18× · Went dark 0.31× · 95% wipeout 1.02×
- Reid & Priest LLPFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 54 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.38× · Went dark 0.67× · 95% wipeout 0.91×
- Shearman & SterlingFirst linked May 2015 · Text search only · 2,649 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.21× · Went dark 0.13× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Holland & KnightFirst linked Sep 2011 · Text search only · 413 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.17× · Went dark 0.82× · 95% wipeout 1.19×
- Thelen LLPFirst linked Sep 2008 · Text search only · 22 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.16× · Went dark 2.33× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pillsbury Winthrop | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 516 | 1.13 | 0.82 | 1.27 |
| Morgan Lewis | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 1,028 | 1.18 | 0.31 | 1.02 |
| Reid & Priest LLP | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 54 | 1.38 | 0.67 | 0.91 |
| Shearman & Sterling | May 2015 | Text search only | 2,649 | 1.21 | 0.13 | 0.87 |
| Holland & Knight | Sep 2011 | Text search only | 413 | 1.17 | 0.82 | 1.19 |
| Thelen LLP | Sep 2008 | Text search only | 22 | 1.16 | 2.33 | 1.31 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey BallantineFirst linked Nov 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 9 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.00× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Sean M. DonahuePaul HastingsFirst linked Sep 2018 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.99× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
- John T. HoodMorgan LewisFirst linked Sep 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.93× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| J. ANTHONY TERRELLDewey Ballantine | Nov 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 9 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Sean M. DonahuePaul Hastings | Sep 2018 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 1.99 | 0.00 | 0.79 |
| John T. HoodMorgan Lewis | Sep 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 5 | 0.93 | 0.00 | 0.00 |