HENRY SCHEIN INC HSIC (last ticker on record)
CIK 1000228Its SEC filings (opens in a new tab)
- Restructuring
- Delisting notice (not a red flag)
- SEC/DOJ scrutiny
These figures describe clients, not conduct. A lawyer or firm can serve many companies that later had trouble for reasons that have nothing to do with their work, and nothing here says any lawyer or firm did anything wrong.
- Red flags
- 2
- Newest began Jul 2025
- Largest fall in its shares
- —
- None of 95% on record
- Law firms
- 3
- Linked to 5 or more companies
- Lawyers
- 5
- Linked to 5 or more companies
What happened
- Far more SEC letters than usualSEC letter (opens in a new tab)
- Delisting notice (Item 3.01)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- A filing mentions a grand jury subpoenaForm 10-Q (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
- Exit or disposal costs (Item 2.05)Form 8-K (opens in a new tab)
An SEC release can name a company’s officer, or its stock as what a scheme sold or moved, so the company may be the victim. Each link goes to what to read.
Law firms
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Cummings & LockwoodFirst linked Jul 1997 · Named in a filing · 29 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.07× · Went dark 0.49× · 95% wipeout 2.03×
- Proskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 492 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.15× · Went dark 0.48× · 95% wipeout 1.08×
- ROGERS & WELLSFirst linked Jun 2001 · Text search only · 69 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.05× · Went dark 0.34× · 95% wipeout 1.25×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cummings & Lockwood | Jul 1997 | Named in a filing | 29 | 1.07 | 0.49 | 2.03 |
| Proskauer Rose | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 492 | 1.15 | 0.48 | 1.08 |
| ROGERS & WELLS | Jun 2001 | Text search only | 69 | 1.05 | 0.34 | 1.25 |
Lawyers
The ratios are about all the companies linked to each one, this one included: how many had that outcome, as a multiple of what comparable companies show. 1.00 means no more than expected.
- Michael E. EllisProskauer RoseFirst linked Dec 2024 · Named in a filing · 5 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.07× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.87×
- Andrea S. RattnerProskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 2011 · Named in SEC correspondence · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 2.05× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.00×
- Julie M. AllenProskauer RoseFirst linked Nov 2004 · Named in SEC correspondence · 41 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 1.49× · Went dark 0.50× · 95% wipeout 1.38×
- Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer RoseFirst linked Jul 2002 · Named in a filing · 8 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 3.08× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 1.31×
- Robert A. CantoneProskauer RoseFirst linked Jun 1996 · Named in SEC correspondence · 20 linked companiesSEC/DOJ scrutiny 0.84× · Went dark 0.00× · 95% wipeout 0.79×
| Name | First linked | How it is known | Linked companies | SEC/DOJ scrutiny | Went dark | 95% wipeout |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Michael E. EllisProskauer Rose | Dec 2024 | Named in a filing | 5 | 3.07 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| Andrea S. RattnerProskauer Rose | Jun 2011 | Named in SEC correspondence | 8 | 2.05 | 0.00 | 0.00 |
| Julie M. AllenProskauer Rose | Nov 2004 | Named in SEC correspondence | 41 | 1.49 | 0.50 | 1.38 |
| Steven L. KirshenbaumProskauer Rose | Jul 2002 | Named in a filing | 8 | 3.08 | 0.00 | 1.31 |
| Robert A. CantoneProskauer Rose | Jun 1996 | Named in SEC correspondence | 20 | 0.84 | 0.00 | 0.79 |