CONSTELLATION ENERGY GENERATION LLC
For the period ended Sep 30, 2025. Filed Nov 7, 2025.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Sep 30, 2025 · Filed Nov 7, 2025
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 2. Results of Operations
| Three Months Ended September 30, · $ Change · Nine Months Ended September 30, · $ Change | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 · 2024 · 2025 · 2024 | ||||||
| Operating revenues | $6,570 | $6,550 | $20 | $19,459 | $18,186 | $1,273 |
| Operating expenses | ||||||
| Purchased power and fuel | 3,567 | 3,119 | 448 | 11,083 | 8,828 | 2,255 |
| Operating and maintenance | 1,511 | 1,535 | (24) | 4,673 | 4,666 | 7 |
| Depreciation and amortization | 241 | 266 | (25) | 743 | 868 | (125) |
| Taxes other than income taxes | 165 | 165 | — | 472 | 446 | 26 |
| Total operating expenses | 5,484 | 5,085 | 399 | 16,971 | 14,808 | 2,163 |
| Gain (loss) on sales of assets and businesses | — | 2 | (2) | — | 2 | (2) |
| Operating income (loss) | 1,086 | 1,467 | (381) | 2,488 | 3,380 | (892) |
| Other income and (deductions) | ||||||
| Interest expense, net | (134) | (147) | 13 | (398) | (416) | 18 |
| Other, net | 443 | 325 | 118 | 729 | 693 | 36 |
| Total other income and (deductions) | 309 | 178 | 131 | 331 | 277 | 54 |
| Income (loss) before income taxes | 1,395 | 1,645 | (250) | 2,819 | 3,657 | (838) |
| Income tax (benefit) expense | 466 | 449 | 17 | 928 | 768 | 160 |
| Equity in income (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates | — | — | — | — | (1) | 1 |
| Net income (loss) | 929 | 1,196 | (267) | 1,891 | 2,888 | (997) |
| Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests | (1) | (4) | 3 | 4 | (9) | 13 |
| Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders | $930 | $1,200 | $(270) | $1,887 | $2,897 | $(1,010) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Three Months Ended September 30, 2024. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was unfavorable by ($270) million primarily due to:
Lower Nuclear PTC revenues in 2025. See Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information; and
Unfavorable net unrealized losses on economic hedges.
The unfavorable items were partially offset by:
Favorable market and portfolio conditions primarily driven by higher capacity revenues and generation-to-load optimization; and
Higher net unrealized gains on equity investments.
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2025 Compared to Nine Months Ended September 30, 2024. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was unfavorable by ($1,010) million primarily due to:
Lower Nuclear PTC revenues in 2025. See Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information;
Unfavorable net unrealized losses on economic hedges; and
Higher net unrealized losses on equity investments.
The unfavorable items were partially offset by:
Favorable market and portfolio conditions primarily driven by higher capacity revenues and generation-to-load optimization;
Favorable net ZEC revenues, including the impacts of higher revenue recognized for ZECs delivered under the Illinois ZEC program in prior planning years; and
Favorable net realized and unrealized NDT fund investment activity.
Operating revenues. Our five reportable segments are Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, New York, ERCOT, and Other Power Regions. See Note 5 —Segment Information of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these reportable segments.
Wholesale and retail sales of natural gas, as well as sales of other energy-related products and sustainable solutions and other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations are reported under Other and not allocated to a region.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 2024, Operating revenues were as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change(a) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change(a) | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $1,763 | $1,603 | $160 | 10.0% | $4,876 | $4,148 | $728 | 17.6% |
| Midwest | 1,390 | 1,275 | 115 | 9.0% | 4,317 | 3,537 | 780 | 22.1% |
| New York | 558 | 507 | 51 | 10.1% | 1,655 | 1,534 | 121 | 7.9% |
| ERCOT | 628 | 523 | 105 | 20.1% | 1,489 | 1,201 | 288 | 24.0% |
| Other Power Regions | 1,543 | 1,443 | 100 | 6.9% | 4,277 | 4,252 | 25 | 0.6% |
| Total reportable segment electric revenues | 5,882 | 5,351 | 531 | 9.9% | 16,614 | 14,672 | 1,942 | 13.2% |
| Other | 844 | 683 | 161 | 23.6% | 3,201 | 2,745 | 456 | 16.6% |
| Mark-to-market gains (losses) | (156) | 516 | (672) | (356) | 769 | (1,125) | ||
| Total Operating revenues | $6,570 | $6,550 | $20 | 0.3% | $19,459 | $18,186 | $1,273 | 7.0% |
Sales and Supply Sources. Our sales and supply volumes (GWhs) by region are summarized below:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (GWhs) | 2025 | 2024 | Change | % Change | 2025 | 2024 | Change | % Change |
| Nuclear Generation(a) | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 13,665 | 13,420 | 245 | 1.8% | 39,105 | 39,839 | (734) | (1.8)% |
| Midwest | 23,644 | 23,835 | (191) | (0.8)% | 71,000 | 71,381 | (381) | (0.5)% |
| New York | 6,671 | 5,893 | 778 | 13.2% | 19,585 | 18,657 | 928 | 5.0% |
| ERCOT | 2,497 | 2,362 | 135 | 5.7% | 7,541 | 6,340 | 1,201 | 18.9% |
| Total Nuclear Generation | 46,477 | 45,510 | 967 | 2.1% | 137,231 | 136,217 | 1,014 | 0.7% |
| Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 242 | 329 | (87) | (26.4)% | 1,683 | 1,809 | (126) | (7.0)% |
| Midwest | 141 | 151 | (10) | (6.6)% | 785 | 774 | 11 | 1.4% |
| ERCOT | 4,325 | 4,783 | (458) | (9.6)% | 10,615 | 11,890 | (1,275) | (10.7)% |
| Other Power Regions | 1,466 | 1,850 | (384) | (20.8)% | 4,556 | 7,017 | (2,461) | (35.1)% |
| Total Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables | 6,174 | 7,113 | (939) | (13.2)% | 17,639 | 21,490 | (3,851) | (17.9)% |
| Purchased Power | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 5,416 | 6,022 | (606) | (10.1)% | 13,960 | 12,707 | 1,253 | 9.9% |
| Midwest | 403 | 107 | 296 | 276.6% | 1,366 | 639 | 727 | 113.8% |
| ERCOT | 714 | 771 | (57) | (7.4)% | 2,209 | 2,496 | (287) | (11.5)% |
| Other Power Regions | 11,451 | 10,813 | 638 | 5.9% | 32,295 | 30,855 | 1,440 | 4.7% |
| Total Purchased Power | 17,984 | 17,713 | 271 | 1.5% | 49,830 | 46,697 | 3,133 | 6.7% |
| Total Supply/Sales by Region | ||||||||
| Mid-Atlantic | 19,323 | 19,771 | (448) | (2.3)% | 54,748 | 54,355 | 393 | 0.7% |
| Midwest | 24,188 | 24,093 | 95 | 0.4% | 73,151 | 72,794 | 357 | 0.5% |
| New York | 6,671 | 5,893 | 778 | 13.2% | 19,585 | 18,657 | 928 | 5.0% |
| ERCOT | 7,536 | 7,916 | (380) | (4.8)% | 20,365 | 20,726 | (361) | (1.7)% |
| Other Power Regions | 12,917 | 12,663 | 254 | 2.0% | 36,851 | 37,872 | (1,021) | (2.7)% |
| Total Supply/Sales by Region | 70,635 | 70,336 | 299 | 0.4% | 204,700 | 204,404 | 296 | 0.1% |
(a)Includes the proportionate share of output where we have an undivided ownership interest in jointly-owned generating plants.
Nuclear Fleet Capacity Factor. The following table presents nuclear fleet operating data for our plants that reflects our ownership percentage for stations operated by us and excludes Salem and STP, which are operated by PSEG and STPNOC, respectively. The nuclear fleet capacity factor presented in the table is defined as the ratio of the actual output of a unit (or combination of units) over a period of time to its output if the unit had operated at net monthly mean capacity for that time period. We consider capacity factor to be a useful measure to analyze the nuclear fleet performance between periods. We have included the analysis below as a complement to the financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. However, these measures are not a presentation defined under GAAP and may not be comparable to other companies’ presentations or be more useful than the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this report.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | 2025 | 2024 | |
| Nuclear fleet capacity factor | 96.8% | 95.0% | 95.3% | 94.6% |
| Refueling outage days | 23 | 37 | 152 | 164 |
| Non-refueling outage days | 5 | 20 | 27 | 33 |
Electricity Prices. As a producer and supplier of electricity, the price of electricity has a significant impact on our operating revenues and purchased power cost. We report the sale and purchase of electricity in the spot market on a net hourly basis in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense within each region, depending on our net hourly position. The price of electricity is impacted by several variables, including but not limited to, the price of fuels, generation resources in the region, weather, ongoing competition, emerging technologies, as well as macroeconomic and regulatory factors. The following table presents an average day-ahead around-the-clock reference price ($/MWh) for the periods presented for each of our major regions and does not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realized.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location (Region) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
| PJM West (Mid-Atlantic) | $46.77 | $36.98 | $9.79 | 26.5% | $47.63 | $33.41 | $14.22 | 42.6% |
| ComEd (Midwest) | 42.72 | 28.92 | 13.80 | 47.7% | 36.37 | 25.80 | 10.57 | 41.0% |
| Central (New York) | 49.51 | 33.30 | 16.21 | 48.7% | 54.07 | 31.80 | 22.27 | 70.0% |
| North (ERCOT) | 35.05 | 26.61 | 8.44 | 31.7% | 33.06 | 27.75 | 5.31 | 19.1% |
| Southeast Massachusetts (Other)(a) | 50.43 | 38.37 | 12.06 | 31.4% | 65.16 | 37.34 | 27.82 | 74.5% |
(a)Reflects New England, which comprises the majority of the activity in the Other region.
Capacity Prices. We participate in capacity auctions in each of our major regions, except ERCOT which does not have a capacity market. We also incur capacity costs associated with load served, which are factored into customer sales prices. Capacity prices have a material impact on our operating revenues and purchased power and fuel expense. We report capacity on a net monthly basis within each region in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense, depending on our net monthly position. The following table presents the average capacity prices ($/MW Day) for each of our major regions. Prices reflect the weighted average prices for the various auction periods within the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Location (Region) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
| Eastern Mid-Atlantic Area Council (Mid-Atlantic) | $269.92 | $53.60 | $216.32 | 403.6% | $149.74 | $51.32 | $98.42 | 191.8% |
| ComEd (Midwest) | 269.92 | 28.92 | 241.00 | 833.3% | 136.03 | 31.81 | 104.22 | 327.6% |
| Rest of State (New York) | 193.33 | 132.22 | 61.11 | 46.2% | 137.52 | 112.78 | 24.74 | 21.9% |
| Southeast New England (Other) | 87.97 | 949.57 | (861.60) | (90.7)% | 566.63 | 459.07 | 107.56 | 23.4% |
ZEC Prices. We are compensated through state programs for the carbon-free attributes of our nuclear generation. The following table includes the average ZEC reference prices ($/MWh) for each of our major regions in which state programs have been enacted. Gross prices reflect the weighted average price for the various delivery periods within the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024 and may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realize as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| State (Region)(a) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change |
| New Jersey (Mid-Atlantic)(b) | $— | $10.00 | $(10.00) | (100.0)% | $10.00 | $9.97 | $0.03 | 0.3% |
| Illinois (Midwest) | 1.17 | 9.38 | (8.21) | (87.5)% | 5.73 | 4.34 | 1.39 | 32.0% |
| New York (New York) | 14.76 | 18.27 | (3.51) | (19.2)% | 15.93 | 18.27 | (2.34) | (12.8)% |
(a)See ITEM 1. BUSINESS, Environmental Matters of our 2024 Form 10-K for additional information on the plants receiving payments through state programs.
(b)The New Jersey ZEC program ended in May 2025.
Illinois CMC Price. The price received (paid) for each CMC is determined by the IPA monthly by subtracting energy and capacity index prices from the bid price, which resulted in $32.50 per MWh for the period June 2023 through May 2024, $33.43 per MWh for the period June 2024 through May 2025 and $33.50 per MWh for the period June 2025 through May 2026. If the monthly CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net positive value, ComEd will multiply that value by the delivered quantity and pay the total to us. If the CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net negative value, we will multiply this value by the delivered quantity and pay the net value to ComEd. The average CMC prices per MWh were ($17.11) and $5.54 for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and ($6.53) and $7.73 for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The average CMC prices may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realize as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.
Nuclear PTC. Beginning in 2024, our nuclear units are eligible for a PTC extending through 2032. The nuclear PTC provides a transferable credit up to $15 per MWh and is subject to phase-out when annual gross receipts are between $25.00 per MWh and $43.75 per MWh and $26.00 per MWh and $44.75 per MWh for 2024 and 2025, respectively. Both the amount of the PTC and the gross receipts thresholds adjust for inflation annually through the duration of the program based on the GDP price deflator for the preceding calendar year.
Many of the state-sponsored programs (e.g., ZECs and CMCs) providing compensation for the emissions-free attributes of generation from certain of our nuclear units include contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received. See Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the nuclear PTC.
The following table summarizes the impacts to Operating revenues related to the benefits of nuclear PTC and state-sponsored programs subject to refund or pass through as described above for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 2024:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change | |
| Nuclear PTC revenue(a) | $175 | $670 | $(495) | (73.9)% | $220 | $1,380 | $(1,160) | (84.1)% |
| State-sponsored programs net revenue(b) | (220) | (115) | (105) | (91.3)% | (30) | 10 | (40) | (400.0)% |
(a)Our estimate required the exercise of judgment in determining the amount of nuclear PTC expected for each of our nuclear units. Refer to Note 6 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
(b)Includes only state-sponsored programs that have contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 2024, changes in Operating revenues by region were approximately as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $160 | 10.0% | • favorable retail load revenue of $185 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes• favorable wholesale load revenue of $80 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($160) due to higher energy prices in the current year | $728 | 17.6% | • favorable retail load revenue of $445 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes• favorable realized economic hedges of $410 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable wholesale load revenue of $200 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($340) due to higher energy prices in the current year |
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | |
| Midwest | 115 | 9.0% | • favorable retail load revenue of $190 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes• favorable realized economic hedges of $175 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $130 primarily due to higher load volumes and contracted energy prices• favorable net capacity revenue of $90 due to higher capacity prices; partially offset by• lower nuclear PTC revenue of ($280) and CMC program revenue of ($155) due to higher energy prices in the current year | 780 | 22.1% | • favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $500 primarily due to higher load volumes and contracted energy prices• favorable realized economic hedges of $540 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable retail load revenue of $310 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes• favorable net ZEC revenue of $180 primarily due to revenue recognized for Illinois ZECs delivered in prior planning years and increase in ZEC price• favorable net capacity revenue of $110 due to higher capacity prices; partially offset by• lower nuclear PTC revenue of ($710) and CMC program revenue of ($160) due to higher energy prices in the current year |
| New York | 51 | 10.1% | • favorable net generation revenue of $70 primarily due to higher energy prices• favorable ZEC program revenue of $50 primarily due to the absence of nuclear PTC revenue; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($60) due to higher energy prices in the current year | 121 | 7.9% | • favorable net generation revenue of $185 primarily due to higher energy prices• favorable ZEC program revenue of $90 primarily due to the absence of nuclear PTC revenue• favorable retail load revenue of $85 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($120) due to higher energy prices in the current year• unfavorable realized economic hedges of ($115) due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | |
| ERCOT | 105 | 20.1% | • favorable wholesale load revenue of $45 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices | 288 | 24.0% | • favorable realized economic hedges of $110 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable wholesale load revenue of $95 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices• favorable retail load revenue of $65 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices |
| Other Power Regions | 100 | 6.9% | • favorable net wholesale load revenue of $80 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices | 25 | 0.6% | • No individually significant drivers |
| Other | 161 | 23.6% | • favorable revenues in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of $100 primarily due to higher energy prices• favorable retail gas revenue of $65 primarily due to higher gas prices | 456 | 16.6% | • favorable retail gas revenue of $305 primarily due to higher gas prices• favorable revenues in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of $180 primarily due to higher energy prices |
| Mark-to-market(b) | (672) | • losses on economic hedging activities of ($156) in 2025 compared to gains of $516 in 2024 | (1,125) | • losses on economic hedging activities of ($356) in 2025 compared to gains of $769 in 2024 | ||
| Total | $20 | 0.3% | $1,273 | 7.0% | ||
(b)See Note 11 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on mark-to-market gains and losses.
Purchased power and fuel. See Operating revenues above for discussion of our reportable segments and hedging strategies and for supplemental statistical data, including sales and supply sources by region, nuclear fleet capacity factor, capacity prices, and electricity prices.
Wholesale and retail natural gas activity, as well as other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations are reported under Other and are not allocated to a region.
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 2024, Purchased power and fuel expense were as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30, | Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change(a) | 2025 | 2024 | $ Change | % Change(a) | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $871 | $794 | $77 | 9.7% | $2,393 | $1,906 | $487 | 25.6% |
| Midwest | 447 | 391 | 56 | 14.3% | 1,489 | 1,185 | 304 | 25.7% |
| New York | 159 | 150 | 9 | 6.0% | 458 | 460 | (2) | (0.4)% |
| ERCOT | 213 | 120 | 93 | 77.5% | 589 | 375 | 214 | 57.1% |
| Other Power Regions | 1,200 | 1,010 | 190 | 18.8% | 3,560 | 3,157 | 403 | 12.8% |
| Total electric purchased power and fuel | 2,890 | 2,465 | 425 | 17.2% | 8,489 | 7,083 | 1,406 | 19.9% |
| Other | 702 | 537 | 165 | 30.7% | 2,664 | 2,149 | 515 | 24.0% |
| Mark-to-market losses (gains) | (25) | 117 | (142) | (70) | (404) | 334 | ||
| Total Purchased power and fuel | $3,567 | $3,119 | $448 | 14.4% | $11,083 | $8,828 | $2,255 | 25.5% |
For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2025 compared to 2024, changes in Purchased power and fuel expense by region were approximately as follows:
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | |
| Mid-Atlantic | $77 | 9.7% | • unfavorable cost of ($105) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices and net capacity expense | $487 | 25.6% | • unfavorable cost of ($465) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices, lower generation volumes, and higher net capacity expense |
| Midwest | 56 | 14.3% | • unfavorable cost of ($40) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily driven by higher energy prices | 304 | 25.7% | • unfavorable cost of ($270) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily driven by higher transmission costs and higher energy prices |
| Three Months Ended September 30 | Nine Months Ended September 30 | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | $ Change | % Change(a) | Description | |
| New York | 9 | 6.0% | • No individually significant drivers | (2) | (0.4)% | • No individually significant drivers |
| ERCOT | 93 | 77.5% | • unfavorable cost of ($60) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices | 214 | 57.1% | • unfavorable cost of ($160) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices• unfavorable realized economic hedges of ($60) due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Other Power Regions | 190 | 18.8% | • unfavorable purchased power of ($240) primarily due to higher energy prices; partially offset by• favorable realized economic hedges of $65 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices | 403 | 12.8% | • unfavorable purchased power of ($1,080)primarily due to lower generation volumes driven by the retirement of Mystic Units 8 and 9 and higher energy prices; partially offset by• favorable realized economic hedges of $730due to settled prices relative to hedged prices |
| Other | 165 | 30.7% | • unfavorable purchases in the United Kingdom, inclusive of settled economic hedges, of ($110) primarily due to higher energy prices• unfavorable net wholesale gas purchases, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of ($40) primarily due to higher gas prices | 515 | 24.0% | • unfavorable net wholesale gas purchases, inclusive of realizedeconomic hedges, of ($250) primarily due to higher gas prices• unfavorable purchases in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of ($205) primarily due to higher energy prices• unfavorable fair value adjustments related to gas imbalances of ($60) |
| Mark-to-market(b) | (142) | • gains on economic hedging activities of $25 in 2025 compared to losses of ($117) in 2024 | 334 | • gains on economic hedging activities of $70 in 2025 compared to gains of $404 in 2024 | ||
| Total | $448 | 14.4% | $2,255 | 25.5% | ||
(b)See Note 11 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on mark-to-market gains and losses.
Effective income tax rates were 33.4% and 27.3% for the three months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively and 32.9% and 21.0% for the nine months ended September 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change in effective tax rate for 2025 is primarily due to the decrease in nuclear PTCs generated, which are not taxable, as well as higher qualified NDT fund income which is taxed at a higher rate. See Note 9 — Income Taxes of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.