Skip to main content

CONSTELLATION ENERGY GENERATION LLC

For the period ended Jun 30, 2025. Filed Aug 7, 2025.

View on SEC.gov

About this filing

A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.

Jun 30, 2025 · Filed Aug 7, 2025

CEG$267.76-3.0%Stored close · as of Nov 10, 2026

Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.

See the whole filing, with its images and exhibits
Contents

Item 2. Results of Operations

Three Months Ended June 30, · $ Change · Six Months Ended June 30, · $ Change
2025 · 2024 · 2025 · 2024
Operating revenues$6,101$5,475$626$12,889$11,637$1,252
Operating expenses
Purchased power and fuel3,1322,2928407,5165,7091,807
Operating and maintenance1,6171,645(28)3,1623,13131
Depreciation and amortization254296(42)502602(100)
Taxes other than income taxes147142530728225
Total operating expenses5,1504,37577511,4879,7241,763
Operating income (loss)9511,100(149)1,4021,913(511)
Other income and (deductions)
Interest expense, net(118)(142)24(264)(269)5
Other, net4406434286368(82)
Total other income and (deductions)322(136)4582299(77)
Income (loss) before income taxes1,2739643091,4242,012(588)
Income tax (benefit) expense440154286462318144
Equity in income (losses) of unconsolidated affiliates—(1)1—(2)2
Net income (loss)833809249621,692(730)
Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests(6)(5)(1)5(5)10
Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders$839$814$25$957$1,697$(740)

Three Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared to Three Months Ended June 30, 2024. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was favorable by $25 million primarily due to:

Favorable net ZEC revenues, including the impacts of higher revenue recognized for ZECs delivered under the Illinois ZEC program in prior planning years;

Favorable net realized and unrealized NDT fund investment activity; and

Favorable market and portfolio conditions primarily driven by higher capacity revenues and generation-to-load optimization.

The favorable items were partially offset by:

Lower Nuclear PTC revenues in 2025. See Note 5 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information; and

Unfavorable lower net unrealized gains on economic hedges.

Six Months Ended June 30, 2025 Compared to Six Months Ended June 30, 2024. The variance in Net income (loss) attributable to common shareholders was unfavorable by ($740) million primarily due to:

Unfavorable net unrealized losses on economic hedges;

Lower Nuclear PTC revenues in 2025. See Note 5 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information; and

Higher net unrealized losses on equity investments.

The unfavorable items were partially offset by:

Favorable net ZEC revenues, including the impacts of higher revenue recognized for ZECs delivered under the Illinois ZEC program in prior planning years;

Favorable market and portfolio conditions primarily driven by higher capacity revenues, higher realized margins on load contracts and generation-to-load optimization; and

Favorable net realized and unrealized NDT fund investment activity.

Operating revenues. Our five reportable segments are Mid-Atlantic, Midwest, New York, ERCOT, and Other Power Regions. See Note 4 —Segment Information of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on these reportable segments.

Wholesale and retail sales of natural gas, as well as sales of other energy-related products and sustainable solutions and other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations are reported under Other and not allocated to a region.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 2024, Operating revenues were as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
20252024$ Change% Change(a)20252024$ Change% Change(a)
Mid-Atlantic$1,448$1,304$14411.0%$3,113$2,546$56722.3%
Midwest1,5241,16835630.5%2,9282,26266629.4%
New York535514214.1%1,0971,027706.8%
ERCOT46435710730.0%86267818427.1%
Other Power Regions1,1781,184(6)(0.5)%2,7342,808(74)(2.6)%
Total reportable segment electric revenues5,1494,52762213.7%10,7349,3211,41315.2%
Other86675611014.6%2,3562,06229414.3%
Mark-to-market gains (losses)86192(106)(201)254(455)
Total Operating revenues$6,101$5,475$62611.4%$12,889$11,637$1,25210.8%

Sales and Supply Sources. Our sales and supply sources by region are summarized below:

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
(GWhs)20252024Change% Change20252024Change% Change
Nuclear Generation(a)
Mid-Atlantic12,26313,229(966)(7.3)%25,44026,419(979)(3.7)%
Midwest23,76023,6251350.6%47,35647,546(190)(0.4)%
New York6,6326,685(53)(0.8)%12,91312,7641491.2%
ERCOT2,5151,77574041.7%5,0443,9781,06626.8%
Total Nuclear Generation45,17045,314(144)(0.3)%90,75390,707460.1%
Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables
Mid-Atlantic81061219832.4%1,4421,480(38)(2.6)%
Midwest258284(26)(9.2)%643623203.2%
ERCOT3,2063,592(386)(10.7)%6,2907,107(817)(11.5)%
Other Power Regions1,2861,617(331)(20.5)%3,0905,168(2,078)(40.2)%
Total Natural Gas, Oil, and Renewables5,5606,105(545)(8.9)%11,46514,378(2,913)(20.3)%
Purchased Power
Mid-Atlantic3,7503,31643413.1%8,5446,6851,85927.8%
Midwest475225250111.1%96353343080.7%
ERCOT8371,060(223)(21.0)%1,4951,725(230)(13.3)%
Other Power Regions9,8499,6432062.1%20,84420,0428024.0%
Total Purchased Power14,91114,2446674.7%31,84628,9852,8619.9%
Total Supply/Sales by Region
Mid-Atlantic16,82317,157(334)(1.9)%35,42634,5848422.4%
Midwest24,49324,1343591.5%48,96248,7022600.5%
New York6,6326,685(53)(0.8)%12,91312,7641491.2%
ERCOT6,5586,4271312.0%12,82912,810190.1%
Other Power Regions11,13511,260(125)(1.1)%23,93425,210(1,276)(5.1)%
Total Supply/Sales by Region65,64165,663(22)—%134,064134,070(6)—%

(a)Includes the proportionate share of output where we have an undivided ownership interest in jointly-owned generating plants.

Nuclear Fleet Capacity Factor. The following table presents nuclear fleet operating data for our plants that reflects our ownership percentage for stations operated by us and excludes Salem and STP, which are operated by PSEG and STPNOC, respectively. The nuclear fleet capacity factor presented in the table is defined as the ratio of the actual output of a unit (or combination of units) over a period of time to its output if the unit had operated at net monthly mean capacity for that time period. We consider capacity factor to be a useful measure to analyze the nuclear fleet performance between periods. We have included the analysis below as a complement to the financial information provided in accordance with GAAP. However, these measures are not a presentation defined under GAAP and may not be comparable to other companies’ presentations or be more useful than the GAAP information provided elsewhere in this report.

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2025202420252024
Nuclear fleet capacity factor94.8%95.4%94.5%94.4%
Refueling outage days4149129127
Non-refueling outage days2232213

Electricity Prices. As a producer and supplier of electricity, the price of electricity has a significant impact on our operating revenues and purchased power cost. We report the sale and purchase of electricity in the spot market on a net hourly basis in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense within each region, depending on our net hourly position. The price of electricity is impacted by several variables, including but not limited to, the price of fuels, generation resources in the region, weather, ongoing competition, emerging technologies, as well as macroeconomic and regulatory factors. The following table presents an average day-ahead around-the-clock reference price ($/MWh) for the periods presented for each of our major regions and does not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realized.

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
Location (Region)20252024$ Change% Change20252024$ Change% Change
PJM West (Mid-Atlantic)$42.43$30.80$11.6337.8%$48.06$31.62$16.4452.0%
ComEd (Midwest)31.0922.418.6838.7%33.2024.248.9637.0%
Central (New York)37.4027.2210.1837.4%56.3631.0525.3181.5%
North (ERCOT)32.7530.901.856.0%32.0728.313.7613.3%
Southeast Massachusetts (Other)(a)40.3129.4610.8536.8%72.5336.8235.7197.0%

(a)Reflects New England, which comprises the majority of the activity in the Other region.

Capacity Prices. We participate in capacity auctions in each of our major regions, except ERCOT which does not have a capacity market. We also incur capacity costs associated with load served, which are factored into customer sales prices. Capacity prices have a material impact on our operating revenues and purchased power and fuel expense. We report capacity on a net monthly basis within each region in either Operating revenues or Purchased power and fuel expense, depending on our net monthly position. The following table presents the average capacity prices ($/MW Day) for each of our major regions. Prices reflect the weighted average prices for the various auction periods within the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024.

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
Location (Region)20252024$ Change% Change20252024$ Change% Change
Eastern Mid-Atlantic Area Council (Mid-Atlantic)$125.71$50.86$74.85147.2%$89.65$50.18$39.4778.7%
ComEd (Midwest)109.2532.3976.86237.3%69.0933.2635.83107.7%
Rest of State (New York)132.8998.3334.5635.1%109.61102.427.197.0%
Southeast New England (Other)662.37360.97301.4083.5%805.97213.82592.15276.9%

ZEC Prices. We are compensated through state programs for the carbon-free attributes of our nuclear generation. The following table includes the average ZEC reference prices ($/MWh) for each of our major regions in which state programs have been enacted. Gross prices reflect the weighted average price for the various delivery periods within the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024 and may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realize as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
State (Region)(a)20252024$ Change% Change20252024$ Change% Change
New Jersey (Mid-Atlantic)(b)$10.00$9.97$0.030.3%$10.00$9.96$0.040.4%
Illinois (Midwest)6.643.333.3199.4%8.011.816.20342.5%
New York (New York)14.7618.27(3.51)(19.2)%16.5218.27(1.75)(9.6)%

(a)See ITEM 1. BUSINESS, Environmental Matters of our 2024 Form 10-K for additional information on the plants receiving payments through state programs.

(b)The New Jersey ZEC program ended in May 2025. The ZEC price is expected to be approximately $10.00/MWh for each delivery period and is subject to an annual update once full year generation is known. Following the latest annual update in August 2024, the ZEC price for the delivery period beginning June 2023 through May 2024 was calculated to be $9.95/MWh.

Illinois CMC Price. The price received (paid) for each CMC is determined by the IPA monthly by subtracting energy and capacity index prices from the bid price, which resulted in $32.50 per MWh for the period June 2023 through May 2024, $33.43 per MWh for the period June 2024 through May 2025 and $33.50 per MWh for the period June 2025 through May 2026. If the monthly CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net positive value, ComEd will multiply that value by the delivered quantity and pay the total to us. If the CMC price per MWh calculation results in a net negative value, we will multiply this value by the delivered quantity and pay the net value to ComEd. The average CMC prices per MWh were ($0.42) and $10.10 for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively, and ($1.23) and $8.83 for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The average CMC prices may not necessarily reflect prices we ultimately realize as a result of interaction with the nuclear PTC discussed below.

Nuclear PTC. Beginning in 2024, our nuclear units are eligible for a PTC extending through 2032. The nuclear PTC provides a transferable credit up to $15 per MWh (a base credit of $3 per MWh with a five times multiplier provided certain prevailing wage requirements are met) and is subject to phase-out when annual gross receipts are between $25.00 per MWh and $43.75 per MWh and $26.00 per MWh and $44.75 per MWh for 2024 and 2025, respectively. We evaluated and expect to meet the annual prevailing wage requirements at all of our nuclear units and are eligible for the five times multiplier. Both the amount of the PTC and the gross receipts thresholds adjust for inflation annually through the duration of the program based on the GDP price deflator for the preceding calendar year. The benefits of the PTC may be realized through a credit against our federal income taxes or transferred via sale to an unrelated party.

Many of the state-sponsored programs (e.g., ZECs and CMCs) providing compensation for the emissions-free attributes of generation from certain of our nuclear units include contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received. See Note 5 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on the nuclear PTC.

The following table summarizes the impacts to Operating revenues related to the benefits of nuclear PTC and state-sponsored programs subject to refund or pass through as described above for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 2024:

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
20252024$ Change% Change20252024$ Change% Change
Nuclear PTC revenue(a)$45$408$(363)(89)%$45$712$(667)(93.7)%
State-sponsored programs net revenue(b)75512447%1901207058.3%

(a)Our estimate required the exercise of judgment in determining the amount of nuclear PTC expected for each of our nuclear units. Refer to Note 5 — Government Assistance of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

(b)Includes only state-sponsored programs that have contractual or other provisions that require us to refund that compensation up to the amount of the nuclear PTC received or pass through the entirety of the nuclear PTC received.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 2024, changes in Operating revenues by region were approximately as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30Six Months Ended June 30
$ Change% Change(a)Description$ Change% Change(a)Description
Mid-Atlantic$14411.0%• favorable realized economic hedges of $100 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable retail load revenue of $110 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($95) in the current year$56722.3%• favorable realized economic hedges of $360 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable retail load revenue of $265 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes• favorable wholesale load revenue of $120 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes; partially offset by• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($180) in the current year
Three Months Ended June 30Six Months Ended June 30
$ Change% Change(a)Description$ Change% Change(a)Description
Midwest35630.5%• favorable ZEC revenue of $175 primarily due to revenue recognized for Illinois ZECs delivered in prior planning years• favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $170 primarily due to higher load volumes and contracted energy prices• favorable realized economic hedges of $165 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable retail load revenue of $75 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes; partially offset by• lower nuclear PTC revenue of ($230) in the current year66629.4%• favorable net generation and wholesale load revenue of $385 primarily due to higher load volumes and contracted energy prices• favorable realized economic hedges of $365 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable ZEC revenue of $220 primarily due to revenue recognized for Illinois ZECs delivered in prior planning years and increase in ZEC price• favorable retail load revenue of $125 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices and load volumes; partially offset by• lower nuclear PTC revenue of ($425) in the current year
New York214.1%• No individually significant drivers706.8%• favorable net generation revenue of $115 primarily due to higher energy prices• favorable retail load revenue of $75 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices; partially offset by• unfavorable realized economic hedges of ($100) due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• absence of nuclear PTC revenue of ($65) in the current year
ERCOT10730.0%• favorable realized economic hedges of $60 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices18427.1%• favorable realized economic hedges of $70 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices• favorable wholesale load revenue of $50 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices• favorable retail load revenue of $50 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices
Three Months Ended June 30Six Months Ended June 30
$ Change% Change(a)Description$ Change% Change(a)Description
Other Power Regions(6)(0.5)%• No individually significant drivers(74)(2.6)%• unfavorable net wholesale load revenue of ($140) primarily due to lower contracted prices; partially offset by• favorable retail load revenue of $55 primarily due to higher contracted energy prices
Other11014.6%• favorable gas revenue of $100 primarily due to higher gas prices29414.3%• favorable gas revenue of $240 primarily due to higher gas prices• favorable revenues in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of $85 primarily due to higher energy prices
Mark-to-market(b)(106)• gains on economic hedging activities of $86 in 2025 compared to gains of $192 in 2024(455)• losses on economic hedging activities of ($201) in 2025 compared to gains of $254 in 2024
Total$62611.4%$1,25210.8%

(b)See Note 10 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on mark-to-market gains and losses.

Purchased power and fuel. See Operating revenues above for discussion of our reportable segments and hedging strategies and for supplemental statistical data, including sales and supply sources by region, nuclear fleet capacity factor, capacity prices, and electricity prices.

Wholesale and retail natural gas activity, as well as other miscellaneous business activities that are not significant to overall results of operations are reported under Other and are not allocated to a region.

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 2024, Purchased power and fuel expense were as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
20252024$ Change% Change(a)20252024$ Change% Change(a)
Mid-Atlantic$666$544$12222.4%$1,522$1,111$41137.0%
Midwest4884038521.1%1,04279424831.2%
New York138141(3)(2.1)%299310(11)(3.5)%
ERCOT1931435035.0%37725412348.4%
Other Power Regions99789110611.9%2,3592,1482119.8%
Total electric purchased power and fuel2,4822,12236017.0%5,5994,61798221.3%
Other73156716428.9%1,9631,61335021.7%
Mark-to-market losses (gains)(81)(397)316(46)(521)475
Total Purchased power and fuel$3,132$2,292$84036.6%$7,516$5,709$1,80731.7%

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to 2024, changes in Purchased power and fuel expense by region were approximately as follows:

Three Months Ended June 30Six Months Ended June 30
$ Change% Change(a)Description$ Change% Change(a)Description
Mid-Atlantic$12222.4%• unfavorable cost of ($110) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices and lower generation volumes$41137.0%• unfavorable cost of ($360) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices and increased load served
Midwest8521.1%• unfavorable cost of ($70) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily driven by higher net transmission costs24831.2%• unfavorable cost of ($225) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily driven by higher net transmission costs
New York(3)(2.1)%• No individually significant drivers(11)(3.5)%• No individually significant drivers
ERCOT5035.0%• No individually significant drivers12348.4%• unfavorable cost of ($100) associated with purchased power to supply load relative to generation volumes primarily due to higher energy prices
Other Power Regions10611.9%• unfavorable purchased power of ($220) primarily due to higher energy prices; partially offset by• favorable realized economic hedges of $110 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices2119.8%• unfavorable purchased power of ($840) primarily due to lower generation volumes driven by the retirement of Mystic Units 8 and 9 and higher energy prices; partially offset by• favorable realized economic hedges of $665 due to settled prices relative to hedged prices
Other16428.9%• unfavorable net gas purchases, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of ($115) primarily due to higher gas prices35021.7%• unfavorable net gas purchases, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of ($200) primarily due to higher gas prices• unfavorable purchases in the United Kingdom, inclusive of realized economic hedges, of ($95) primarily due to higher energy prices• unfavorable fair value adjustments related to gas imbalances of ($50)
Mark-to-market(b)316• gains on economic hedging activities of $81 in 2025 compared to gains of $397 in 2024475• gains on economic hedging activities of $46 in 2025 compared to gains of $521 in 2024
Total$84036.6%$1,80731.7%

(b)See Note 10 — Derivative Financial Instruments of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information on mark-to-market gains and losses.

Other, net was favorable for the three and six months ended June 30, 2025 compared to the same period in 2024, due to activity described in the table below:

Income (Deductions)
Three Months Ended June 30,Six Months Ended June 30,
2025202420252024
Decommissioning-related activities(a)$437$51$531$347
Net realized and unrealized gains (losses) from equity investments(b)(7)(58)(275)(11)
Other10133032
Other, net$440$6$286$368

(a)Includes net realized and net unrealized gains (losses) on NDT fund investments, the elimination of decommissioning-related activities, and the elimination of income taxes related to all NDT fund activity for the Regulatory Agreement Units. See Note 7 — Nuclear Decommissioning and Note 16 — Supplemental Financial Information of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

(b)Includes unrealized gains (losses) resulting from an equity investment in a publicly traded company. We record the fair value of this investment in Investments on the Consolidated Balance Sheets based on quoted market price of the stock.

Effective income tax rates were 34.6% and 16.0% for the three months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively and 32.4% and 15.8% for the six months ended June 30, 2025 and 2024, respectively. The change in effective tax rate for 2025 is primarily due to the decrease in nuclear PTCs generated, which are not taxable, as well as higher qualified NDT fund income which is taxed at a higher rate. See Note 8 — Income Taxes of the Combined Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements for additional information.

ContentsView on SEC.gov

The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.