BLACKSTONE MORTGAGE TRUST, INC.

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of

New York, New York

Opinions on the Financial Statements and Internal Control over Financial Reporting

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Blackstone Mortgage Trust, Inc and subsidiaries (the

“Company”) as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive income,

changes in equity, and cash flows, for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2025, and the related notes

and the schedules listed in the Index at Item 15(a)(collectively referred to as the “financial statements”). We also have

audited the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in

Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway

Commission (COSO).

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the

Company as of December 31, 2025 and 2024, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years

in the period ended December 31, 2025, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of

America. Also, in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial

reporting as of December 31, 2025, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework (2013) issued

by COSO.

Basis for Opinions

The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over

financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the

accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an

opinion on these financial statements and an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on

our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United

States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal

securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and

perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement,

whether due to error or fraud, and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material

respects.

Our audits of the financial statements included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the

financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures to respond to those risks. Such procedures

included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits

also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as

evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting

included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness

exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our

audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that

our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial Reporting

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the

reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with

generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and

procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the

transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded

as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and

that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and

directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized

acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,

projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate

because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Critical Audit Matters

The critical audit matters communicated below are matters arising from the current-period audit of the financial statements

that were communicated or required to be communicated to the audit committee and that (1) relate to accounts or

disclosures that are material to the financial statements and (2) involved our especially challenging, subjective, or complex

judgments. The communication of critical audit matters does not alter in any way our opinion on the financial statements,

taken as a whole, and we are not, by communicating the critical audit matters below, providing separate opinions on the

critical audit matters or on the accounts or disclosures to which they relate.

Current Expected Credit Loss (“CECL”) Reserve – Adjustments to Reflect Management’s Estimation of Economic

Conditions – Refer to Note 2 in the Financial Statements

The Company estimates its CECL reserve primarily using the Weighted Average Remaining Maturity (“WARM”) method,

which has been identified as an acceptable loss-rate method for estimating CECL reserves. The Company utilizes its own

historical loan loss data supplemented with the data obtained from an external service provider. The data obtained is

subject to several screening and/or judgmental adjustments that are applied in order to better align this loan-level data to

the attributes of the Company’s loan portfolio.

The Company’s CECL reserve determined under the WARM method is further adjusted to reflect management’s

estimation of the current and future economic conditions that may impact the performance of the commercial real estate

assets securing the Company’s loans. The items considered in management’s estimation include unemployment rates,

interest rates and other macroeconomic factors impacting the likelihood and magnitude of potential credit losses for the

Company’s loans during their anticipated term.

We identified the adjustments to the CECL reserve to reflect management’s estimation of the current and future economic

conditions that may impact the performance of the commercial real estate assets securing the Company’s loans as a critical

audit matter because of the subjectivity, complexity and estimation uncertainty in such adjustments made to account for the

macroeconomic factors. This required a high degree of auditor judgment and an increased extent of effort when performing

audit procedures to evaluate whether the adjustments determined by management reasonably and appropriately quantify

macroeconomic risks associated with the Company’s loan portfolio, including the need to involve our credit specialists.

Our audit procedures to assess the adjustments applied by management to the CECL reserve to account for current and

future economic conditions included, among others:

•We tested the design and operating effectiveness of controls implemented by the Company in relation to the

establishment of the CECL reserve. Specifically, in relation to the adjustments made to their CECL reserve to

account for current and future economic conditions, we focused our procedures on internal controls related to

evaluation of macroeconomic factors and other judgments involved in the determination of such adjustments.

•We evaluated the appropriateness and consistency of the methods and assumptions used by management to

develop the adjustments and assessed macro-economic and industry trends.

•We tested the accuracy and completeness of quantitative data used by management to develop the adjustments to

account for current and future economic conditions.

•We utilized credit specialists to assist in the evaluation of management’s CECL methodology and assumptions,

including the estimation of economic conditions.

CECL Reserve – Estimation of Fair Value of Underlying Collateral of Impaired Loans – Refer to Note 2 and Note 3

in the Financial Statements

The Company assesses the CECL reserve for impaired loans on an individual basis by comparing the estimated fair value

of the underlying collateral, less costs to sell, to the book value of the respective loan. These valuations require significant

judgment, which include assumptions regarding capitalization rates, discount rates, leasing, creditworthiness of major

tenants, occupancy rates, availability and cost of financing, exit plan, loan sponsorship, actions of other lenders, and other

factors deemed relevant by the Company.

We identified the estimation of the fair value of the underlying collateral of impaired loans as a critical audit matter

because of the complexity and judgement involved in the determination of the valuation methodology and assumptions, as

well as subjectivity of the unobservable inputs utilized in the valuation. Auditing the fair value of the underlying collateral

for impaired loans required a high degree of auditor judgment and increased effort, including the need to involve our fair

value specialists.

Our audit procedures related to the estimate of fair value of the underlying collateral of impaired loans as part of estimation

of the CECL reserve included, among others:

•We tested the design and operating effectiveness of controls over the estimation of the fair value of the collateral

underlying the impaired loans, including specifically management’s review of the valuation model and underlying

assumptions utilized in estimating the fair value of the underlying collateral.

•We tested management’s assumptions through independent analysis and comparison to external sources.

•We utilized our internal fair value specialists to assist in the evaluation of management’s valuation methodologies

and assumptions. With the assistance of our specialists, we evaluated certain of these assumptions (e.g., guideline

transactions, discount rates, capitalization rates). Our internal specialist procedures included testing the underlying

source information of the assumptions, as well as developing a range of independent estimates and comparing

those to the assumptions used by management.

Allocation of Purchase Price for Owned Real Estate – Refer to Notes 2 and 4 in the Financial Statements

The Company has acquired legal title or otherwise consolidated five owned real estate assets, for an aggregate acquisition

date fair value of $654.3 million during 2025. Accordingly, the purchase price paid for assets acquired and liabilities

assumed was allocated, based on fair value, to building, land, furniture, fixtures, and equipment, site and tenant

improvements, in-place leases, above and below market leases, other intangible assets and liabilities and other tangible

assets and liabilities. The method for determining fair value varied depending on the type of real estate investment and

associated assets acquired and liabilities assumed and involved management making significant estimates related to

assumptions such as future cash flows, capitalization rates, discount rates, and sales comparables.

We identified the allocation of purchase price as a critical audit matter because of the significant estimates management

makes to determine the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed. This required a high degree of auditor

judgment and an increased extent of effort, including the need to involve our fair value specialists, when performing audit

procedures to evaluate the reasonableness of management’s assumptions.

Our audit procedures related to the relative fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed by the Company included

the following, among others:

•We tested the effectiveness of controls over management’s critical assumptions including:

◦The selection of the methods and valuation techniques used to determine that fair value is appropriate and

consistent with industry standards.

◦The assumptions for allocating the purchase price to tangible and intangible assets and liabilities.

•We held discussions with the Company’s management and evaluated Company-prepared analyses to assess the

reasonableness of the accounting treatment as an asset acquisition as opposed to a business combination.

•We obtained and evaluated the third-party purchase price allocation report along with relevant supporting

documentation, in order to corroborate our understanding of the substance of the acquisition obtained through

inquiry with the Company’s management, as well as assess the completeness of the assets acquired and liabilities

assumed as part of the acquisition.

•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we evaluated the reasonableness of the valuation methodology,

costs to replace certain assets, and significant assumptions used in the cash flow models, including testing the

mathematical accuracy of the calculation and comparing the key inputs used in the projections to external market

sources.

•With the assistance of our fair value specialists, we tested the reasonableness of management's capitalization and

discount rates by comparing the assumptions used to external market sources.

•We tested the reasonableness of management's projections of the property's net operating income by comparing

the assumptions used in the projections to external market sources, executed lease agreements, historical data, and

results from other areas of the audit.

/s/Deloitte & Touche LLP

New York, New York

February 11, 2026

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2013