BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL INC
For the period ended Mar 31, 2024. Filed Apr 26, 2024.
View on SEC.govAbout this filing
A company's report for each of its first three quarters. The financial statements are not audited. It shows how the business has moved since the last annual report, and what management says changed.
Mar 31, 2024 · Filed Apr 26, 2024
Extracted filing text, with the paragraph anchors used by the comparison.
See the whole filing, with its images and exhibitsContents
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
On October 22, 2021, a purported securities class action lawsuit was filed against us, our prior Chief Executive Officer, our current and prior Chief Financial Officers, and our President of Worldwide Research & Development in the United States District Court for the Northern District of California, alleging violations under Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act). The complaint alleges that we made materially false or misleading statements regarding BMN 307 by purportedly failing to disclose information about BMN 307’s safety profile, and by purportedly overstating BMN 307’s clinical and commercial prospects. The complaint seeks an unspecified amount of damages, pre-judgment and post-judgment interest, attorneys’ fees, expert fees, and other costs. The Court appointed lead plaintiffs and lead counsel on January 10, 2022. Lead plaintiffs filed an amended complaint on March 25, 2022. We filed a motion to dismiss the amended complaint on May 25, 2022. On January 19, 2023, the Court granted our motion to dismiss the complaint without prejudice. On February 21, 2023, the court dismissed the complaint with prejudice at plaintiffs’ request. Plaintiffs appealed the court’s January 19, 2023 order to the United State Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit and filed their opening brief on June 23, 2023. We filed our answering brief on August 23, 2023. Plaintiffs filed their reply brief on October 13, 2023. On February 15, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit affirmed the district court's dismissal.
On January 19, 2023 and May 30, 2023, certain of our officers and directors were named as defendants in two shareholder derivative actions filed in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaints assert, inter alia, breach of fiduciary duty claims arising from the facts underlying the securities class action related to ROCTAVIAN. The complaints seek unspecified monetary damages, internal governance reforms by the Company, attorneys’ fees and costs, and any other relief the court may deem just and proper. The parties in the derivative lawsuits have entered into a stipulation of settlement, that, subject to final approval by the Court of Chancery, will resolve the derivative lawsuits.
On April 4, 2024, a purported stockholder class action was filed against us and our Board of Directors in the Delaware Court of Chancery. The complaint also named as defendants Elliott Investment Management L.P., Elliott Associates, L.P., and Elliott International, L.P., which are parties to the Cooperation Agreement with the Company. The complaint asserted a claim for declaratory judgment, seeking an order that certain provisions of the Cooperation Agreement are invalid, and, on April 4, 2024, the plaintiff moved for expedited proceedings as to the claim for declaratory judgment. In addition, the complaint asserted a claim for breach of fiduciary duty against certain directors in connection with approval of the Cooperation Agreement, as well as a claim against the Elliott parties for aiding and abetting the directors’ alleged breaches of fiduciary duty. On April 11, 2024, the Elliott parties executed a waiver of the challenged provisions in the Cooperation Agreement. In light of that waiver, on April 16, 2024, the plaintiff filed a stipulation and proposed order to dismiss the action as moot, with the court to retain jurisdiction to determine plaintiff’s counsel’s application for an award of attorneys’ fees and expenses. Also on April 16, 2024, the Court granted the order, dismissing all claims with prejudice, as to the named plaintiff only.
The text of this filing, as the company filed it with the SEC, without its images or exhibits. This is not investment advice.